Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47

Score 57

The inability of people on X to understand what it means when the President flagrantly ignores the courts is breathtaking.

Many people here have absolutely no understanding of history.

James Surowiecki

@JamesSurowiecki

The Supreme Court has said that Trump is required to facilitate - which means, as Judge Wilkinson said in his opinion yesterday, take active steps to make happen - Garcia's return. And instead the White House is publicly, and mockingly, saying "He's never coming back."

4/18/2025, 5:37:33 PM

The statement criticizes the public's understanding of the President's actions in defying a court order, suggesting a lack of historical awareness. It expresses frustration and concern over the implications of such actions.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight a significant issue regarding the rule of law, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for legal adherence. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement could promote understanding by encouraging awareness of historical and legal contexts, but its tone is somewhat dismissive, which may hinder empathy.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of those who misunderstand the situation, but it does so in a way that could be perceived as condescending, potentially violating the principle of constructive dialogue. [-1]