The statement addresses a public issue by discussing student activism related to divestment from Israel and the response of institutions, which includes allegations of repression and ICE detentions. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and call for action.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by accusing institutions of 'brutal repression' without providing evidence, potentially inciting further division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of charged terms like 'genocide' could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without engaging with opposing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to bring attention to a societal issue, but does so in a divisive manner.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible, given the lack of evidence and potential for inciting division. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.