Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 66

The statement engages in a discussion about economists' perspectives on AGI timelines, contrasting different viewpoints. It implies a critique of certain economists while praising others, suggesting a divide in opinions within the field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of some economists, which could be seen as dismissive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive, bordering on disrespectful.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses some economists without detailed reasoning.聽[-1]