Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 79
4/19/2025, 1:22:53 AM
X
In reply to:
Shaun Ralston
@shaunralston
·
13d
@GaryMarcus Gary, I’m all for free speech and a chorus of viewpoints (srsly), but oy gevalt, you’re coming off like a nonstop "kvetcher," especially lately, when you won’t acknowledge the progress we’ve made. We may not be at the finish line, yet we’re miles ahead of where we started, and
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
13d
👇2025 version of Geoff Hinton’s infamous (and wrong) 2016, “we should stop training radiologists now. It's just completely obvious that within five years, deep learning is going to do better than radiologist.” [AFAIK No actual radiologists have yet been replaced, almost a decade
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
13d
Gates is correct: within a decade, up to 80-90% of doctors, teachers, professors, engineers or lawyers will be replaced by AI. The remaining professionals will focus on aiding AI to make discoveries, create new knowledge & to keep it aligned to benefit humans in these fields.

The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing predictions about AI development and its impact on industries, referencing past predictions and current debates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but rather engages in a discussion about technological predictions.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement could promote understanding by encouraging reflection on past predictions and current technological progress. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of predictions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]