Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96
4/19/2025, 1:03:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
34d
@asbelcas @GaryMarcus I think the blue check mark is false advertising. I don't think it gives anyone the reach as it is claimed to offer.
casey armstrong
@asbelcas
·
34d
@IntuitMachine @GaryMarcus I'm just a, non blue check mark, peasant, yet I think some of MY posts are even shadow banned. Especially when they're critical of certain people.
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
34d
@GaryMarcus I agree. The reach of AI folks is drastically smaller than before. I'm also unsure if people are also tuning out due to information overload.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
34d
A lot of people have been asking if I am shadowbanned; i would guess yes.
Louis Santoro
@dikaiosvne
·
34d
@GaryMarcus Wow, are you shadowbanned? The reach is preposterously low.

But is o3 not an incredible model?

The statement 'Pity we no longer have a functioning government to investigate' is a critique of the perceived lack of governmental oversight or action, possibly in relation to issues of transparency and accountability in social media platforms. It engages with public concerns about governance and regulation, particularly in the context of social media influence and shadow banning.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of government functionality, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it raises awareness about a public issue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a systemic issue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, potentially encouraging discourse on government accountability. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing government functionality without misinformation or malice. [+1]