Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 121
ADAM
@AdameMedia
·
70d
Wall Street is full of what?
4/19/2025, 1:52:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
69d
@JamesSurowiecki What changed is only that they got better at convincing people (including themselves) about their bullshit.
James Surowiecki
@JamesSurowiecki
·
69d
The idea that right-wingers "acted normal" toward their opponents until some Dems were mean to Mitt Romney is ludicrous. Right-wingers spent 8 years spreading insane conspiracy theories about the Clintons - including that they had orchestrated a massive drug-smuggling operation

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing political behavior and conspiracy theories. It uses a critical tone to highlight perceived irrationality in political rhetoric.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a derogatory term 'drunk with conspiracy,' which may harm by dismissing opposing views without constructive engagement. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of those it criticizes, potentially engaging in dismissive language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than promoting dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead opting for a dismissive tone. [-1]