Jake Tapper

Rank 20 of 47

Score 69

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

-2

They screwed up with Abrego Garcia and doubled down. They screwed up with Harvard and doubled down. And then, when judges issue sensible orders *in response to their own mistakes* they call it judicial tyranny.

Acyn

@Acyn

43d

Honig: So the white house's position is it was malpractice by Harvard to not realize that this letter was so outrageous it probably wasn't true. I think that statement actually just sort of gives away the whole game.

4/19/2025, 5:32:55 PM

The statement criticizes actions by Trump officials, suggesting a pattern of mistakes and blaming others, including the judiciary, for their consequences. It uses strong language to express disapproval and highlights perceived accountability issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language but does not appear to incite harm.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It criticizes public figures, which is generally acceptable, but should avoid personal attacks. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]