Jake Tapper

The statement criticizes the White House's social media conduct and suggests a disregard for a Supreme Court ruling, indicating a concern for governance and legal adherence. The tone is critical and somewhat alarmist, aiming to highlight perceived irresponsibility and potential legal issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm in governance, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by raising awareness, but the alarmist tone may exaggerate the situation. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the language could be seen as disrespectful, particularly in the phrase 'run by a child.' [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the White House's actions, but the tone is more accusatory than constructive, lacking a call for dialogue or solutions. [-1]