Nikki Haley

The statement 'Obama 2.0' in the context of a discussion about a proposed Iran nuclear deal suggests a comparison to the previous administration's approach to Iran's nuclear program. The tone is likely critical or skeptical, implying a repeat or continuation of past policies. The conversation involves substantive engagement with international relations and nuclear policy, which are public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but may imply criticism of past policies.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a shorthand that may not be clear to all audiences. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement could be seen as a personal attack on a previous administration's policies rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]