Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47

Score 131

@manifesto2000 @PaulSorrentino3 @DNC @dpakman @briantylercohen @SteveSchmidtSES If other candidates had not been purposely deamplified and a real primary squashed, Democratic voters would have seen very early what the problem was and what their actual choices were. On one hand, only a small group of people decided to direct things that way. On the other

4/20/2025, 8:48:58 AM

In reply to:

Alan Blanes

@manifesto2000

@PaulSorrentino3 Not letting Biden compete in a normal primary prevented him from practicing debate and understanding the priorities of other wings of the @DNC which meant he was being set up for disaster. @marwilliamson @dpakman @briantylercohen @SteveSchmidtSES

#gaybaristapaulforpresident

@PaulSorrentino3

supporting genocide isn’t normal

Sibylle

@AHaschi

We could have had a completly normal first Couple 😭

The statement critiques the Democratic primary process, suggesting that it was manipulated to favor a particular candidate, thereby limiting voter choice. It implies a lack of transparency and fairness in the political process.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises concerns about the integrity of the primary process, which could be seen as promoting accountability and transparency, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for fair practices. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks or disrespectful language, thus respecting the dignity of others involved. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of the political process but does not attack individuals personally, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]