Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by critiquing a public figure's message about Easter, comparing it to the author's own interpretation. It implies a political and religious critique, suggesting the president's message was inadequate or inappropriate.
- The statement indirectly criticizes the president's message, which could be seen as harmful or divisive, but it does not directly attack individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but engages in a critique that could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of the president. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it contrasts the author's view with the president's in a competitive manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks, focusing instead on the content of the president's message. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.