Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a critique of messaging from an official Pentagon account, suggesting internal conflict and communication issues within a government department. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, questioning the effectiveness of the messaging strategy.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies dysfunction within a government body, which could undermine trust. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to public skepticism about the Pentagon's internal dynamics. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks, focusing instead on the messaging strategy.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.