In reply to:
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸
@mtgreenee
·
5d
The statement is a reply to a tweet by a public figure discussing global leadership changes and attributing them to divine intervention. This engages with public issues and can be considered public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the context of the conversation could potentially lead to divisive interpretations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is vague and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to substantively contribute to the discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.