Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a policy by the National Institute of Health regarding funding termination for researchers supporting a boycott of Israel. It raises issues of free speech, discrimination, and policy fairness.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting a discriminatory policy, which may not align with the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The policy may violate privacy and dignity by imposing restrictions based on political beliefs, potentially engaging in discrimination. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement invites dialogue on the fairness and implications of the policy, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a policy that could impact societal norms and values, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement raises concerns about free speech, questioning whether the policy responsibly upholds this principle. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.