Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Merav Ceren's appointment to the National Security Council by highlighting her past roles in Israeli defense and COGAT, linking them to controversial actions against Palestinians. The tone is critical and implies a negative view of her appointment.
- The statement may cause harm by associating Ceren with controversial actions without providing a balanced view. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of Ceren, potentially engaging in a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, instead using a critical tone that may be perceived as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.