Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement criticizes OpenAI's proposed restructuring, suggesting it undermines governance safeguards and prioritizes profit over charitable purposes. The tone is accusatory and uses strong language like 'theft of the millennium,' indicating a negative view of OpenAI's actions.
- The statement uses strong, potentially harmful language, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in harsh criticism, bordering on disrespect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue, opting for strong accusations instead. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.