The statement questions why a potentially significant achievement by the @jacobandreas lab is not being discussed, suggesting a lack of attention to their performance compared to o3-medium. It implies a need for broader recognition and discussion of different AI systems' performances.
- The statement does not cause harm and raises a valid question about recognition in AI research. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by highlighting a potentially overlooked achievement, encouraging discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the lack of discussion without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.