Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a public issue regarding OpenAI's adherence to its charitable obligations, suggesting legal and ethical concerns. It calls for action from Attorneys General and implies a need for accountability among board members.
- The statement aims to highlight potential legal and ethical violations, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not naming individuals but calls for accountability, which could impact dignity if not handled carefully.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue by bringing it to public attention, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of OpenAI's actions but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.