Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
4/24/2025, 6:45:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Trevor 馃嚚馃嚘
@TrevorsIdeas
路
269d
@GaryMarcus Just a sneaky way for Anthropic to get free advertising, build hype and legitimacy on the back on the NYT all in one.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
269d
New adventures in NYT hype: Our LLMs are so smart we need to give them rights.

Wait til you see our spreadsheets!!
Kevin Roose
@kevinroose
路
269d
New column: Anthropic is studying "model welfare" to determine if Claude or other AI systems are (or will soon be) conscious and deserve moral status.

I talked to Kyle Fish, who leads the research, and thinks there's a ~15% chance that Claude or another AI is conscious today.

The statement engages in public discourse by critiquing the media's portrayal of AI advancements and the potential motivations of companies like Anthropic. It suggests skepticism about the intentions behind promoting AI consciousness and questions the legitimacy of such claims.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a critical tone but does not appear to cause harm. It questions the motives behind the media portrayal, which is a valid part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique without personal attacks, focusing on the actions of a company rather than individuals.聽[+1]