In reply to:
Jim Dean
@JimDean9000
·
267d
The statement engages in a discussion about the definition of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and references a previous essay that proposed definitions. It suggests that there is a shift in how terms are being defined, which is relevant to public discourse on AI development.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive discussion about definitions in AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by referencing a previous essay that contributed to the discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.