Ilhan Omar

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 154
4/25/2025, 11:15:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
1d
I hosted my annual legislative lunch with leaders from around CD5 to ensure we’re doing everything we can, from the state level to federal, to protect Minnesotans from Donald Trump’s attempts to cut the critical programs Minnesotans rely on for their everyday needs.
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
1d
I’m grateful to have been joined by over 500 community members in North Minneapolis for my April town hall meeting along with 11 MN state legislators. Our community knows that Trump is a five-alarm fire for our democracy, and we’re fighting back with everything we’ve got.
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
1d
It was my honor to provide the Phyllis Wheatley Community Center with a Congressional Record Statement recognizing their remarkable achievement of reaching 100 years of service to our Minneapolis community.
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
1d
We just wrapped up another busy district work week here in Minnesota's Fifth District! From talking to CD5 seniors about protecting Social Security to announcing this year’s Congressional Art Competition winner, here’s how I’ve been #FightingForTheFifth (April 21-24):

The statement is a part of public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue: the potential impact of political actions on Social Security, a critical program for many Minnesotans. The tone is urgent and advocacy-focused, aiming to raise awareness and mobilize action against proposed policy changes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the protection of Social Security, which is vital for many individuals' well-being. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the reliance of over 1.1 million Minnesotans on Social Security. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of political opponents' plans, though it could be seen as partisan. [+1]