Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
Reposted by Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
265d
“I did about five minutes of experimentation, and it’s wildly inconsistent, and that’s what you expect of GenAI, which is very dependent on specific examples in training sets and not very abstract,” says Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist and author of Taming Silicon Valley: How
4/26/2025, 2:09:03 PM
X

The statement critiques the current state of AI, specifically GenAI, and its limitations in achieving AGI. It reflects skepticism about AI's capabilities, aligning with the broader discussion on AI's development and its challenges.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it critiques technology rather than individuals.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the limitations of current AI technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without personal attacks. [+1]