The statement critiques the approach of integrating reinforcement learning (RL) with large language models (LLMs) by highlighting a potential oversight in remembering past challenges associated with RL. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, suggesting a critical view of the current strategy in AI development.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of a strategy, which could be seen as a cautionary reminder.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by pointing out a potential oversight in AI development strategies, encouraging reflection on past challenges. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the strategy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.