The statement addresses the practicality of widespread protest participation, suggesting that most people have other responsibilities. It implies a critique of the idea that everyone can engage in activism full-time.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of activism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It lacks empathy towards those who choose to protest, potentially undermining their efforts. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.