Marianne Williamson

The statement is part of a conversation discussing government deficits and historical political actions, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on public issues and governance.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not cause harm directly, but it could be seen as dismissive of the previous concern about government deficits, which might not promote a constructive dialogue.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it seems to question the relevance of a cryptocurrency in addressing a serious economic issue without providing further explanation. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not contribute to constructive criticism or dialogue either, as it questions the previous statement without offering a substantive counterpoint.