Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 102
4/29/2025, 12:41:02 AM
X
In reply to:
Bradish
@Bradish80551798
·
18d
@marwilliamson Did you take things out of context and blast Obama / Biden with contorted spin? No, didn't think so.

You're not a hack, but your post reads like it was written by a Taylor Lorenz trained intern who majored in hyperventilation.

Re: 2028 hats, he's a master troll. Won't happen.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
18d
@Bradish80551798 What do you call selling hats that say Trump 2028 when the 22nd Amendment says a president can only run twice? What do you call ignoring the demands of the Supreme Court? What do you call constantly spewing out executive orders, many of which you know are illegal, rather than
Bradish
@Bradish80551798
·
18d
@marwilliamson Marianne, stop. You're better than this crap.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
18d
Trump’s ultimate goal is to have Congress pass a law authorizing him to ignore the Constitution and govern by decree.

Notice he’s doing those those things already, by the way. There’s nothing in his playbook that hasn’t already been demonstrated by dictators who came before

The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to presidential actions, constitutional concerns, and political accountability. The tone is assertive and defensive, aiming to clarify the speaker's stance on political criticism and independence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a heated political debate.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding personal attacks or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on defending the speaker's actions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does not offer constructive criticism or address the substance of the disagreement. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and demonstrates the speaker's intent to use their platform responsibly by clarifying their position. [+1]