In reply to:
PhDBlonde👱Live Your Best 𝕏𝕏 Life
@PhdBlonde
·
48d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the rules regarding prayer in the Capitol rotunda, which touches on issues of religious freedom and civil rights. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on the rules that led to the arrest of a religious leader.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, simply asking a question about the rules.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others and does not engage in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the rules, the statement could promote understanding and dialogue about religious freedom and civil rights. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and seeks clarification, which can lead to constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning public policy in a responsible manner. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.