In reply to:
Tyler John
@tyler_m_john
·
261d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
261d
The statement engages in a discussion about the complexities of coding values into AI systems, particularly in the context of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). It questions the inherent challenges of AI development, suggesting that the issue lies with the limitations of current language models rather than AI itself. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification on a technical matter.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a technical discussion, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by questioning and clarifying a complex issue, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning a point made in a previous conversation without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive discussion about AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.