Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 83

@mileshuman @seconds_0 and lots more here https://garymarcus.substack.com/… with a review of prior predictions (mostly correct), too

4/29/2025, 11:29:53 PM

In reply to:

Miles 🇺🇦 🌻

@mileshuman

258d

@seconds_0 I do credit @GaryMarcus for making some specific, falsifiable predictions, e.g. here: https://garymarcus.substack.com/…

0.005 Seconds (3/694)

@seconds_0

258d

These types of claims are never made falsifiable. In fact, most AI haters refuse to make falsifiable claims, in writing, about what AI won't be able to do or won't progresss.

Anyone making these claims without a definition can safely be ignored.

dax

@thdxr

259d

LLMs will never get meaningfully better than they are now

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of AI predictions and the credibility of such predictions. It engages with ongoing debates about the future of AI and the importance of making falsifiable claims. The tone is informative and aims to contribute to the discussion by sharing a resource that reviews past predictions and offers new ones.

Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by sharing a resource that reviews past predictions and offers new insights, which can help others form informed opinions about AI. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by acknowledging the value of making specific, falsifiable predictions, which is a response to a critique about the lack of such claims in AI discourse. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement uses the platform responsibly by sharing a resource that contributes to the public's understanding of AI predictions, thus upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]