Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
4/30/2025, 12:10:10 AM
X
In reply to:
0.005 Seconds (3/694)
@seconds_0
·
258d
@GaryMarcus I am looking at your Brundage Tasks and am curious how you evaluate these because I am almost certain Gemini 2.5 could do 2, today

For write obituaries or bios, what information are they given? Just access to the weights? Do they need to do original research

6 I have done today
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
258d
@seconds_0 see https://garymarcus.substack.com/… and https://garymarcus.substack.com/…

I have made many specific falsifiable predictions and offered to put money on them.

then again i don’t hate AI, and people who think I do misunderstand my position.
0.005 Seconds (3/694)
@seconds_0
·
258d
These types of claims are never made falsifiable. In fact, most AI haters refuse to make falsifiable claims, in writing, about what AI won't be able to do or won't progresss.

Anyone making these claims without a definition can safely be ignored.
dax
@thdxr
·
259d
LLMs will never get meaningfully better than they are now

The statement is part of a public discourse on the capabilities and future predictions of AI, specifically addressing the reliability and falsifiability of claims about AI advancements. The tone is skeptical and seeks evidence for claims made about AI's capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the need for systematic and reliable evidence. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by expressing interest in reliable evidence, rather than dismissing the claims outright or attacking the individual. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by questioning the reliability of claims and seeking evidence, which is a responsible use of discourse in the context of AI predictions. [+1]