In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
257d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
257d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the capabilities and limitations of AI in software development, specifically debugging. It references a study and an article to support the claim that AI is not yet capable of replacing human coders for debugging tasks. This contributes to the ongoing debate about AI's role in coding and its potential impact on the industry.
- The statement does not cause harm and provides information based on research, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By referencing research, the statement promotes understanding of AI's current limitations, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing evidence to counter a claim, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.