Gary Marcus

The conversation involves accusations of intellectual theft and personal attacks, which detract from constructive dialogue. The initial statement by @GaryMarcus accuses someone of stealing ideas and lying about credentials, which is a serious claim but lacks evidence in this context. @Gestalt_enjoyer attempts to mediate by suggesting embracing an ally, but the response from @GaryMarcus remains accusatory. The reply by @Gestalt_enjoyer referencing @SchmidhuberAI seems to support the claim of a pattern of behavior, but it doesn't directly address the accusations or promote resolution.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The conversation does not strive to do no harm, as it includes personal attacks and accusations. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The privacy and dignity of individuals are not respected due to the public nature of the accusations. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The conversation lacks empathy and understanding, focusing instead on conflict. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   There is no constructive criticism or dialogue; the exchange is adversarial. [-2]