The statement addresses concerns about data integrity in AI evaluation, highlighting the importance of reliable measures of progress. It calls attention to potential issues with a widely used AI leaderboard, suggesting that recent progress may be questionable. The tone is cautionary and aims to promote awareness and integrity in scientific evaluation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on data integrity issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and integrity by highlighting the importance of trustworthy evaluations in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing potential flaws in the evaluation process without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.