The statement reports on an alleged request by Shari Redstone to delay sensitive news stories about Trump or his policies, which raises concerns about media integrity and potential influence on public information. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses issues of media ethics, freedom of the press, and potential conflicts of interest in news reporting.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it highlights a potential issue where delaying news could harm public awareness.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on actions related to public figures and media organizations, not engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a potential ethical issue in media practices, which could contribute to societal betterment by promoting transparency. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a matter of public interest and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.