Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47

Score -90

-3

Just as anyone who had bothered to google “virus leaks from laboratory” in early 2020 would have discovered warning after warning of lab leaks, anyone on Monday who looked could have found report after report warning of the thing that happened.

5/1/2025, 1:13:23 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

39d

The media insisted for days that renewables weren’t to blame for the blackout in Spain, even though anyone with a basic understanding of the electrical grid knew they were. Finally the media is starting to tell the truth.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

Renewables don't risk blackouts, said the media. But they did and they do. The physics are simple. And now, as blackouts in Spain strand people in elevators, jam traffic, and ground flights, it's clear that too little "inertia" due to excess solar resulted in system collapse.

The statement critiques media coverage of renewable energy's role in blackouts, suggesting a lack of transparency and accuracy. It implies that warnings were ignored or underreported, drawing a parallel to past events. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived media failures.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to inform but may contribute to public fear or misunderstanding about renewables, potentially causing harm. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It lacks empathy and understanding towards media challenges, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of the media but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]