In reply to:
Curt Tigges
@CurtTigges
路
245d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
245d
The statement questions the assumption that increased computational power directly correlates with increased intelligence in AI models. It suggests that different measures might yield different conclusions and highlights the potential issue of data contamination as a confounding factor.
- The statement does no harm and encourages critical thinking about AI development metrics.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by questioning assumptions and encouraging a deeper analysis of AI performance metrics.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by challenging a point without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.