Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a response to a military action and its implications, which are significant public issues involving international relations and security. It addresses the actions of a state actor and their potential consequences, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement describes a military action as a 'dangerous escalation,' which implies potential harm. It does not directly promote harm but highlights the risks involved.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a formal tone without attacking individuals or groups.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on conveying a position regarding the military action. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents a position on the military action without targeting individuals personally.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant international issue, which can contribute to public awareness and dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a position on a public issue, using its platform to communicate a governmental stance. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.