The statement references John Lithgow's awareness of cancel culture and its impact on careers, linking to an article about his views on JK Rowling's handling of backlash regarding her trans stance. This touches on public discourse as it involves societal issues like cancel culture and public reactions to controversial opinions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but acknowledges the potential harm of cancel culture.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a public figure's handling of backlash. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.