Marianne Williamson

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 55
5/4/2025, 5:46:38 AM
X
In reply to:
Ralph Nader
@RalphNader
·
46d
If you can provide an explanation for this phenomenon, let us know at https://www.ralphnaderradiohour.…. I guess all these people don’t believe that none of us are as smart as all of us which may partially explain why they keep losing and losing. -R
Ralph Nader
@RalphNader
·
46d
Similarly Lina Khan Chair of the FTC, Rohit Chopra head of the CFPB, SEC Chair Gary Gentler never returned our calls. We don’t take this personally because these and other elected and appointed progressives have been incommunicado to a lot of other progressive civic
Ralph Nader
@RalphNader
·
46d
Despite repeated calls over the years to connect on substantive issues—some already underway by these people and some to be proposed to these people—we’ve not heard at all from Senator Sanders, Senator Warren, Senator Klobuchar, former Senator Sherrod Brown (defeated in November
Ralph Nader
@RalphNader
·
46d
Over the years I keep getting asked by civic activists whether we’re working with leaders like @BernieSanders et al. For the sake of convenience, here’s the summary:

The statement 'I don’t understand it, but I think it’s shameful' is a response to a discussion initiated by Ralph Nader about the lack of communication from certain progressive leaders. The tone is one of disapproval and confusion, indicating a critical stance towards the situation described by Nader. The intent seems to be to express dissatisfaction with the lack of engagement from these leaders, which is a public issue concerning civic dialogue and political accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses a negative opinion, which is a mild critique rather than harmful speech.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It expresses a critical opinion without targeting individuals personally. [+1]