Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
5/4/2025, 2:39:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Imad Mugniyeh
@AScully789
·
240d
It hasn't crrated these things because no one yet focusing theeese tools on these uses. There is not yet a $300m book publisher putting $5m marketing campaigns on AI generated books neither is there a Universal level music studio spending $20m to promote an AI artiste
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
240d
Generative AI hasn’t created memorable songs, books, and movies, despite insanely large amount of input. Why not?

I see three reasons:

1. Everything Generative AI does is derivative and tends to be a kind of average.

2. Generative AI it lacks a deep conceptual

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the capabilities and limitations of generative AI in creating culturally significant works like songs, books, and movies. The tone is dismissive, suggesting that the previous argument is merely an excuse ('cope'). The intent seems to be to challenge or refute the idea that AI's lack of significant cultural output is due to insufficient investment or focus.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous argument without providing a substantive counter-argument, which could be seen as a minor violation of this principle. [-1]