Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion on the use of the IRS for political purposes, which is a public issue. The question posed by Tapper addresses concerns about potential misuse of governmental power, while Johnson's response suggests a focus on tax policy reform.
- The statement by Tapper seeks to address potential harm by questioning the use of IRS for political purposes, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The question respects privacy and dignity by focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The dialogue encourages constructive criticism by questioning the actions of a political figure, promoting accountability. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.