Reposted by Gary Marcus
gorklon rust
@elonmusk
·
100d
The statement involves a critique of a public figure, Elon Musk, and references a significant journalistic achievement, the Pulitzer Prize, which relates to public discourse on media integrity and accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of Elon Musk's character. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by discussing public information about a public figure, but the mention of drug use and secret meetings could be seen as invasive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on negative aspects of Musk's actions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue but rather presents a critical view without personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue related to journalism and public figures. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.