Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 115
5/5/2025, 8:37:58 PM
X
In reply to:
ribo (gas giant)
@riboprotein
·
92d
@GaryMarcus What's this then https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
93d
Generative AI hasn’t created memorable songs, books, and movies, despite insanely large amount of input. Why not?

I see three reasons:

1. Everything Generative AI does is derivative and tends to be a kind of average.

2. Generative AI it lacks a deep conceptual
Nando de Freitas
@NandoDF
·
93d
Weekend take: AI has generated tons of text, billions of images, video and songs. I feel however it has never generated a song worth listening, a book worth reading or a movie worth watching. Why?

Admittedly, I find myself going back to my ChatGPT and Copilot history, so some

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the capabilities and limitations of generative AI in creating memorable cultural works. It engages with public discourse by addressing the societal implications of AI in creative fields.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral observation about AI's impact on culture.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more of a critique without offering constructive insights.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]