Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 116
5/6/2025, 3:52:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
86d
@GaryMarcus @techreview @bryan_johnson What specifically in the article did you find issue with? Bryan is good at clever marketing but most of his message is well intended and much needed in our current society

“It’s reframing our relationship to body and to mind. It is also a way for people to have deep
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
86d
For shame @techreview. Neither @bryan_johnson nor a new religion will save us from superintelligent AI.

Good policies and international treaties and enforcement and better technology might — but more hype is not what we need.

The statement critiques an article and its subject, questioning the effectiveness of the proposed ideas in addressing superintelligence challenges. It suggests skepticism towards the claims made in the article and implies that more substantial solutions are needed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but questions the validity of the claims, which can be seen as constructive criticism.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes critical thinking by questioning the effectiveness of the proposed ideas. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the claims without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]