Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
·
2d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the public health policy of water fluoridation and the concept of informed consent, which are significant societal issues. The tone is supportive of the decision to ban fluoride, framing it as a matter of personal choice and health freedom.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as promoting a policy that some public health experts might argue could harm public health by reducing dental health benefits of fluoridation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on informed consent and health freedom, though it may not foster empathy or compassion for opposing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on policy.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change that the speaker believes benefits society by enhancing personal choice.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss public policy.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.