Reposted by Ron DeSantis
Ron DeSantis
@GovRonDeSantis
·
177d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public policy issue—fluoridation of public water—and expressing support for a political leader's decision. It touches on themes of personal choice and health freedom, which are relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as promoting a controversial stance that may have public health implications.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of a particular viewpoint on health freedom, though it may not foster empathy or compassion for opposing views.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue with those who disagree.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific agenda, which the speaker believes is for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.