Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement is a call to action directed at a public figure, urging them to address a public issue concerning changes in petition rules by the North Carolina State Board of Elections. It advocates for fair access for third parties and opposes partisan suppression, contributing to civic dialogue on electoral fairness.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on advocating for fair access, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of fair access and broader representation in the electoral process. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by urging a public figure to take a stand on an issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by supporting fair electoral processes. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to address a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.