Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47

Score 94

Reposted by Gary Marcus

For higher education, “AI’s takeover [is] a full-blown existential crisis.”

“College is just how well I can use ChatGPT at this point.”

“I think we are years — or months, probably — away from a world where nobody thinks using AI for homework is considered cheating.”

“It isn’t

5/7/2025, 1:32:22 PM

The statement and image express concern about the impact of AI, specifically ChatGPT, on higher education, suggesting it has led to widespread academic dishonesty and an existential crisis. The tone is alarmist, highlighting a shift in perceptions of cheating and the role of AI in education.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises awareness about potential harm caused by AI in education, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by encouraging discussion. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding of the challenges AI poses to academic integrity, fostering empathy for educators and students navigating this change. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without offering solutions or engaging with opposing perspectives. [-1]