Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and conversation involve a report on a protest at Columbia University, focusing on the actions of campus security and the treatment of protesters and journalists. The tone is urgent and accusatory, highlighting alleged physical aggression by security personnel. The intent is to inform the public about the situation and possibly to criticize the university's handling of the protest and press access.
- The statement accuses campus security of physical aggression, which could be seen as harmful if unverified. However, it aims to highlight potential misconduct. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not naming individuals but could be seen as accusatory towards campus security.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding of the situation by sharing information about the protest and security's actions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes the actions of campus security and the university. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a public issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by advocating for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.