David Scott Patterson
@davidpattersonx
·
65d
The statement challenges the claim that AI will surpass human intelligence and replace jobs, arguing that real-world applications of AI have not met such expectations. It criticizes the reliability of benchmarks used to measure AI's capabilities.
- The statement uses strong language ('Horseshit') which may be considered disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting a discrepancy between AI benchmarks and real-world applications, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the original claim but does so with a dismissive tone, which may not fully align with constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.